User Tools

Site Tools


research-impact

Research + Impact

Impact from research is defined as an effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia.

Daylighting research carried out by Prof Mardaljevic since the 1990s has resulted in significant real-work impact across a wide range of application areas from professional practice to international standards. Some of the key ones listed below are outlined in this short video.


Daylight Criteria for UK School Designs

In 2013 the UK Education Funding Agency (EFA) made CBDM a mandatory requirement for the evaluation of designs submitted for the Priority Schools Building Programme (PSBP). School designs submitted to the PSBP must achieve certain 'target' criteria for the useful daylight illuminance metric (proposed by Prof Mardaljevic in 2005). This is believed to be the first major upgrade to mandatory daylight requirements since the introduction of the daylight factor more than half a century ago. The PSBP has a total value of over £10bn.

The UK adoption of CBDM in mandatory codes has led to a market transformation in both the skills base (numbers of CBDM practitioners) and the range of available software (developers responded very quickly to this new market opportunity).

EFA daylight design guide

J. Mardaljevic. Climate-Based Daylight Modelling And Its Discontents. CIBSE Technical Symposium, London, UK, 16-17 April, 2015.


Central Park Tower (New York): Landmark Daylight Injury Evaluation

When completed in 2020, Central Park Tower 1) will become the world's tallest residential building and the second tallest building in the US. Measures of daylight injury predicted by Prof Mardaljevic using climate-based daylight modelling (CBDM) formed part of the legal agreement for the design/development of the tower. This is the only example anywhere in the world where daylight injury predicted using CBDM has played a substantive part in a legal agreement for the development of a building. It may be some time before it is possible to gauge the full impact of this. However, this remarkable precedent is well-known amongst all leading rights to light practitioners in the UK and also barristers/QCs who specialise in rights to light.

J. Mardaljevic, G. M. Janes, and M. Kwartler. The ‘Nordstrom Tower’: A landmark daylight injury study. CIE 28th Session, Manchester, UK, 2015.


Daylight Measurement + Modelling for Conservation

Electrochromic Glazing: Fundamental Design Principles

Variable transmission glazing allows for the dynamic control of daylight - described as the “Holy Grail of the fenestration industry” 2). Many tens of millions of pounds of R&D money has been spent to bring to market a viable variable transmission glazing product. Of the various competing technologies, only electrochromic (EC) glazing appears to have the necessary optical properties (i.e. wide visible transmission range), is relatively straightforward to install, is already in the marketplace, and undergoing the transition to large-scale production.

Two offices in Leicester were the first spaces in the UK to be fitted with production electrochromic glazing in a project set up by Prof Mardaljevic in partnership with SageGlass. A pioneering study carried out in these offices showed how it is essential to operate the glazing so that a neutral daylight illumination spectrum is maintained in the space. SAGE/St. Gobain commissioned a technical White Paper based on this study which is available as a design guide on the SAGE website.

The Architecture Building on Loughborough University campus was refurbished with triple zone SageGlass EC glazing in 2017.

J. Mardaljevic, R. Kelly Waskett, and B. Painter. Neutral daylight illumination with variable transmission glass: Theory and validation. Lighting Research and Technology, 48(3):267–285, 05 2016.

J. Mardaljevic. How to Maintain Neutral Daylight Illumination with SageGlass Electrochromic Glazing. SAGE Electrochromics White Paper, 2014.


European Daylight Standard

Since 2011 Prof Mardaljevic has served as 'UK Principal Expert' for European Committee for Standardisation CEN/TC 169 WG11 'Daylight in Buildings'. Throughout that time he led both the formulation and the drafting of the daylight part of the standard. In a major break with all previous standards, the methodology (which is normative) bases the targets (which are informative) on the provision of absolute levels of daylight illumination rather than simply relative levels (e.g. 2% daylight factor).

J. Mardaljevic and J. Christoffersen. ‘Climate connectivity’ in the daylight factor basis of building standards. Building and Environment, 113:200–209, 2 2017


Daylighting the New York Times Building

Extensive simulations were used to assist the building owner and manufacturers in making informed decisions on the design and control of an automated roller shade and electric lighting control system for The New York Times Headquarters in the pre- and post-bid phases of the project. A prior monitored field study in a full-scale mockup answered initial questions concerning technical feasibility and performance benefits of automated control. Simulations enabled extension of the monitored field study to the final building in its complex urban context.

Radiance simulations were used for a variety of purposes, from understanding the effects of urban shadow on shade useage to assisting with pre-calibration of photosensor sensitivity in a complex daylit interior environment. Time-lapsed images enabled stakeholders (building owner and manufacturers) to visualize the daylit environment of the final building in its urban context with automated shade control and assess how well visual comfort (direct sun, surface luminance), daylight quality (illuminance level and distribution), and view were to be addressed by the system at different orientations and locations within the building. Inherently, a top-down roller shade compromises daylight when lowered to control direct sun and glare. Simulations were also used to determine whether minor adjustments to the shade control algorithm could increase interior daylight levels without compromising visual comfort. All of the above simulations were made for a discrete set of days, typically solstice and equinox days using CIE clear and overcast sky conditions and was sufficient for the directed purpose.

Annualized, climate-based Radiance simulations were conducted to more thoroughly assess comfort conditions and availability of view. Prof Mardaljevic carried out all of the CBDM work for this landmark daylight evaluation study - 140Gb of generated CBDM data were analysed to derive recommendations for the shade control algorithms. This helped the owner weigh the tradeoffs between number of hours of glare discomfort versus access to view and daylight.

E. S. Lee, S. E. Selkowitz, G. D. Hughes, R. D. Clear, G. Ward, J. Mardaljevic, J. Lai, M. N. Inanici, and V. Inkarojrit. Daylighting the New York Times headquarters building. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Final report LBNL-57602, 2005.

J. Mardaljevic, L. Heschong, and E. Lee. Daylight metrics and energy savings. Lighting Research and Technology, 41(3):261–283, 2009.


Climate-Based Daylight Modelling

Climate-based daylight modelling (CBDM) is the prediction of any luminous quantity (illuminance and/or luminance) using realistic sun and sky conditions derived from standardised climate data. CBDM evaluations are usually carried out for a full year at a time-step of an hour or less in order to capture the daily and seasonal dynamics of natural daylight. Developed in the late 1990s, CBDM steadily gained traction – first in the research community, closely followed by some of the more forward-thinking practitioners. CBDM was pioneered, independently, by Prof Mardaljevic and Prof Christoph Reinhard (MIT).

The BRE-IDMP dataset was used to validate Mardaljevic's unique daylight coefficient approach - known as the 4 Component Method (4CM). This implementation was shown to have comparable high accuracy to the standard Radiance calculation. Thus the 4CM has been used as a benchmark CBDM implementation against which the predictions from other CBDM formulations (e.g. 2-phase, 3-phase, 5-phase, DAYSIM, etc.) have been evaluated for accuracy.

J. Mardaljevic. Simulation of annual daylighting profiles for internal illuminance. Lighting Research and Technology, 32(3):111–118, 1 2000.

J. Mardaljevic. Daylight Simulation: Validation, Sky Models and Daylight Coefficients. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, 2000.


Validation of the Radiance Lighting Simulation System

The widespread adoption of the Radiance lighting simulation system and, ultimately, CBDM was due in large part to the outcomes from validation studies. What is probably still considered the definitive validation study for any daylight prediction method (physical model, analytical or simulation) was carried out by Prof Mardaljevic in the mid 1990s using data collected by the BRE as part of the International Daylight Measurement Programme (the data are sometimes referred to as the BRE-IDMP validation dataset).

That study showed that illuminances predicted using the Radiance system could be within +-10% of measured values, i.e. within the accuracy limits of the measuring instruments themselves. This, quite remarkable, degree of precision needs to be judged alongside the high level of inaccuracies (often in excess of 100\%) that were determined to be fairly typical for physical modelling.

J. Mardaljevic. Validation of a lighting simulation program under real sky conditions. Lighting Research and Technology, 27(4):181–188, 12 1995.

J. Mardaljevic. Daylight Simulation: Validation, Sky Models and Daylight Coefficients. PhD thesis, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, 2000.

J. Mardaljevic. The BRE-IDMP dataset: a new benchmark for the validation of illuminance prediction techniques. Lighting Research and Technology, 33(2):117–134, 2001.

J. Mardaljevic. Verification of program accuracy for illuminance modelling: Assumptions, methodology and an examination of conflicting findings. Lighting Research and Technology, 36(3):217–239, 2004.

1)
Originally named the Nordstrom Tower
2)
Steve Selkowitz, LBNL
research-impact.txt · Last modified: 2018/12/16 22:23 by cbdm